<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Court Rulings &#8211; Public Law and Economics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lawandeconomics2017.weaconferences.net/tag/court-rulings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lawandeconomics2017.weaconferences.net</link>
	<description>1st June to 30th June, 2017</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>The Efficiency-Growth Dilemma: An Analysis of Regulation&#8217;s Impact on Short and Long-Term Development</title>
		<link>https://lawandeconomics2017.weaconferences.net/papers/the-efficiency-growth-dilemma-an-analysis-of-regulations-impact-on-short-and-long-term-development/</link>
					<comments>https://lawandeconomics2017.weaconferences.net/papers/the-efficiency-growth-dilemma-an-analysis-of-regulations-impact-on-short-and-long-term-development/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weaadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 20:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamic Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Impact Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare Overtaking Theorem]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawandeconomics2017.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=104</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the midst of an ongoing recovery of economies worldwide, a growing concern regarding competitiveness and efficient regulations has arisen. Countries have taken different paths in the hopes of procuring higher growth rates, be it through austerity or expansion of &#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the midst of an ongoing recovery of economies worldwide, a growing concern regarding competitiveness and efficient regulations has arisen. Countries have taken different paths in the hopes of procuring higher growth rates, be it through austerity or expansion of State expenditures. Nonetheless, a common concern pertains to installing appropriate incentives, via regulation, in order to expedite desired results. The term &#8220;regulation&#8221; is used in a broad sense, insofar as governmental initiatives, under different forms and issued from all three branches, directly impact the main objective of instilling economic growth. To this end –namely the analysis of regulations&#8217; adequacy to reach their assumed goals–, a Law and Economics framework is of great utility. This paper seeks to investigate efficiency under an intertemporal perspective, rather than the traditional static angle. Our premise is that, amongst several functions of norms, is the potentialization of expected returns and impairment of undesired results. In this sense, although several studies involving immediate impacts on efficiency fomented by means of regulation, legislation, or jurisprudential interpretations already exist, a careful analysis considering the dynamic gain in efficiency remains lacking. In some cases norms generate initial reductions of social welfare, widely compensated by future gains. The contrary may also occur, when regulations apparently produce a momentaneous raise in social welfare, followed by long lasting losses. In the present text, using the framework provided by Law and Economics, particularly the Welfare Overtaking Theorem, the efficiency of legal provisions and judicial rulings is analyzed, in a short and long-term perspective. To this end, an initial outline of the referred theorem is exposed, highlighting important matters that can be better addressed through its teachings, such as the offset of initial inefficiencies due to sustainable growth and the correlation between (in)equality and economic development. In sequence, a brief review of important Law and Economics literature is disclosed in the interest of (a) exemplifying the complexities that surround this debate and (b) furthering the current stance of academic reflections. Mainly in pursuance of the latter, various Brazilian case studies are invoked, such as provisions in the bankruptcy act, an emblematic Supreme Court ruling, and welfare programs instituted by government. The conclusions show that in drafting regulations, laws, and rulings, previous considerations of present and future costs and benefits must be acknowledged, including impacts on society&#8217;s dynamic efficiency. The findings focus on the Brazilian context, but are undoubtedly replicable in numerous other countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://lawandeconomics2017.weaconferences.net/papers/the-efficiency-growth-dilemma-an-analysis-of-regulations-impact-on-short-and-long-term-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
